Yesterday I posted that I do not believe the Kentucky Derby should allow maidens in over horses that are proven winners with points. Many people took my statement ver batim, assuming that this meant I believed a horse with 2 points should get in over a horse like Trojan Nation who earned 40 points when second in the Wood Memorial. That is not so, but let's take a look at this history of maidens in the Kentucky Derby.
Maidens in the Kentucky Derby and other issues
For the first time since 1998 we face the curious situation
of a maiden running in the Kentucky Derby. That maiden is Trojan Nation, a very
well bred son of Street Cry (IRE) out of the Champion 2yo Filly Storm Song (Summer Squall). Trojan Nation has
raced six times, with his lone stakes race resulting in a Derby-qualifying head-bob
loss to Outwork in the Wood Memorial. Prior to that he had never run better than third in his five starts. Unfortunately for the rest of
points-amassing horses, the slowest Wood Memorial in the history of the race
was enough to get this maiden into the twenty horse starting gate. I'm not knocking the Wood Memorial, despite the weak field, it is still a G1 points race. For the
record, ever since the Kentucky Derby points system has been implemented, the
majority of horses entering the starting gate are horses that I have no qualms
with. However, it is my belief that maidens entering over winners with Derby
points is a bit upsetting. Why do I feel this way? Well, let’s take a look at
the facts.
No maiden has won
since 1933
The last maiden to win the Kentucky Derby was in 1933, when
Brokers Tip won by a much debated head bob in an era without photofinishes as
his jockey and the runner-up’s physically fought one another to the wire.
Broker’s Tip entered the Derby a maiden, starting four times
as a two year old and once as a three year old prior to the race. He left the
Derby a victor with his name memorialized in history. There were thirteen
horses in the gate when Broker’s Tip left, but only twelve finished as one was
pulled up midrace.
Broker’s Tip never saw the inside of the winner’s circle
again. That was his sole victory, and after some lackluster starts, he was
retired to stud.
The maiden Sir Barton
and the Triple Crown
The first ever winner of the Triple Crown was Sir Barton,
who is as famous in his initial conquest of the feat as he is in his loss to
Man O’War in a match race the ensuing year. It’s important to note that the
Kentucky Derby did not hold the prestige it currently does, and the Triple
Crown wasn’t a legitimate series until many year later.
Heading into the Kentucky Derby, Sir Barton was a highly average horse. All of his starts as a two year old had come in stakes races, and he had run 5ht, 9th, 9th, 9th, 7th, and 16th before finally running 2nd in the Futurity Stakes at Belmont to conclude his three-year-old campaign.
Heading into the Kentucky Derby, Sir Barton was a highly average horse. All of his starts as a two year old had come in stakes races, and he had run 5ht, 9th, 9th, 9th, 7th, and 16th before finally running 2nd in the Futurity Stakes at Belmont to conclude his three-year-old campaign.
Twelve horses contested the Kentucky Derby in 1919, the year
of Sir Barton’s victory. It was Sir Barton's first start of the season an the horse drastically changed his running style, heading straight ot the lead and never looking back. Prior to that he had been breaking slowly and staying behind.
Sir Barton's case is hard to compare to modern day racing because through the current system, horses are basically require to run prior to the Derby in their sophomore season. Back then the Preakness was contested four days after the Derby, and the Belmont ten days after that. Clearly a different time, so comparison of this maiden winner to the modern era is irrelevant.
Sir Barton's case is hard to compare to modern day racing because through the current system, horses are basically require to run prior to the Derby in their sophomore season. Back then the Preakness was contested four days after the Derby, and the Belmont ten days after that. Clearly a different time, so comparison of this maiden winner to the modern era is irrelevant.
Buchanan Wins the 10th
Derby, breaking his maiden in the process
The tenth running of the Kentucky Derby in 1884, Hall of
Fame Jockey Isaac Murphy wanted nothing to do with his mount, Buchanan.
Naturally fractious before the gate, Buchanan threw his jockey, in turn
provoking Murphy to ask to scratch his horse. Fortunately for Murphy he was
threatened with a suspension if he refused to ride, and the rest is history.
Buchanan won the Derby in a field of six horses. He continued on to win the
Clark Stakes, which at the time was one of the most important races of the
Churchill spring meet. Buchanan was the real deal.
Prior to his entry in the Kentucky Derby, Buchanan had run seven
times at age two, all in stakes races. He had run second five times and twice
he was third. (Note: some sources say six times, but pedigree query has 7
listed runs his two-year-old season)
Maiden Derby contenders
since 1937
Here’s a fun little chart provided by the Kentucky Derby
website. It is a list of maiden competitors and their respected final
positions. As you can see, a maiden has never even cracked the top seven.
Granted, there isn’t a large pool to select from, but the reason there is not a
large pool is because maidens do not belong in the race. End of discussion.
Summary of maiden victors
Brokers Tip, Sir Barton and Buchanan all won the Kentucky
Derby in fields of six to 13 horses. In the modern day Derby system, it is
infrequent that we see a Derby contested that does not include the use of the auxiliary
gate, positions 15-20. We need to adjust to the modern era and acknowledge that
maiden competitors are only going to find it more difficult to contest this
race than ever before. Even back in the day, it’s glaringly obvious that Sir
Barton was a rare exception in that he became a Triple Crown winner and one of
the nicest horses of the early 1900s. Buchanan had run a series of bang-up
races as a two year old, competing solely in stakes and hitting the board in
each of his six starts. Brokers Tip is the oddball out, having never won again,
and no one is actually sure he even won the Derby due to the lack of a photo
finish.
Fillies in the
Kentucky Derby
My friend made the argument that if I were
to bar maidens from competing in the Derby because it has been 83 years since
the last won, then I may as well ban fillies because there was a 65 year gap
between Regret and Genuine Risk. That’s a silly comparison, and I understand he
was trying to make my argument seem trivial (it’s not), but I want to address it
anyway, because not everyone knows the history of fillies in the Derby. Regret
went into the Kentucky Derby an undefeated champion two year old who had
already walloped the boys in the Special, sanford, and Hopeful. The Derby was
her first start of her three-year-old season. She is credited as the horse who brought it to the level of its current-day prestige.
Genuine Risk had run second in the Wood Memorial prior to
the Derby, which in the modern day system would have granted her 40 points,
enough to contest.
Winning Colors had wrecked the boys in the Santa Anita
Derby, which would have given her 100 points under the modern day system.
Clearly irrelevant. I could say let’s ban geldings while we
are at it because Funny Cide was the first to win since Clyde van Dusen in
1929, but that is another silly comparison. Funny Cide wasn’t a maiden and he
had run second in the Wood and Louisiana Derby, and Clyde van Dusen was not a
maiden, being a four times stakes winner as a two year old.
International horses
in the Derby
The UAE
Derby as a qualifying race. Some people think it silly that the UAE Derby is a points
race, and that I should prefer to see a horse win the UAE Derby and run in the
Kentucky Derby over a maiden running in the Derby. The UAE Derby is a graded
stakes (G2) that occurs on one of the biggest international days of racing, the
Dubai World Cup. The United States is attempting to foster international
interest in the Derby by allowing the UAE Derby to be a points race, a symbiotic relationship in that it also attracts USA-based horses to run over in Dubai, i.e. Frank Conversation. Not
exactly sure where the point of contention about whether or not this is valid
is coming from, as only three horses have even bothered to come abroad to run
in the Derby after competing in Dubai, so it is not as though the race is detracting from other points horses.
Lani’s victory in the UAE Derby was his third win from six
starts.
Of UAE Derby winners, three have come over to contest the Kentucky
Derby. Last year, Mubtaahij ran 8th before returning to run 4th
in the Belmont Stakes. He was most recently a strong 2nd to America’s
top male handicap horse California Chrome in the Dubai World Cup.
Regal Ransom is another UAE winner who came over to contest
the Kentucky Derby, running 8th here. He followed that up with a win
in the G2 Super Derby.
Lines of Battle is yet another UAE winner who ran 7th
in the Kentucky Derby but eventually proved himself as a top competitor,
peaking with a G1W in Hong Kong.
Final thoughts
My debate is not about the points system. My debate is that
maidens have an incredibly poor record in the Kentucky Derby, and with the
points system, are still capable of running in it despite other horses with
points who are not maidens. Perhaps Trojan Nation is a rare exception and may
win, but his lackluster five failed maiden special weights attempts followed by
a second in the worst Wood Memorial of all time seriously irks me. Sure, he is
royally bred, but is he qualified? Not in my opinion. However, I do not make
the rules, I’m a simple observer. There are so many flaws with so many systems
in racing that perhaps we should just be grateful that we have a semi-functioning
one finally determining who will run in the Derby, even if it has its quirks.
What would I do to amend this problem if the point system
was up to me? Honestly, a lot more research. I would look at the past performances
of every maiden to run in the Kentucky Derby and compare it to Trojan Nation. I
would see how Trojan Nation performs in the Derby. I’d pray next year’s crop of
horses ix just better in general, because this wouldn’t slide if we weren’t in
a terrible year of three-year-olds. There would have to be a trade off at some
level, a maiden can contest over a winner with points if the non-maidens points
were in lowly enough races as to render them irrelevant (say the Grey Stakes up
at Woodbine during the two-year-old season, etc). Any which way, something has
got to give. But it won't. It's horse racing, after all, the industry that fears change more than any other in the United States!
